Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hi-Lex Controls, Inc., et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 13-1859
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
HI-LEX CONTROLS, INC., HI-LEX AMERICA, INC. and HI-LEX CORPORATION HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
Hi-Lex Controls, Inc., et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 13-1773
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HI-LEX CONTROLS, INC., HI-LEX AMERICA, INC. and HI-LEX CORPORATION HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant - Appellant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
Hi-Lex Controls Incorporated et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2011cv12557
Plaintiff:
Hi-Lex Controls Incorporated , Hi-Lex America, Incorporated and Hi-Lex Corporation Health and Welfare Plan
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
The Shane Group, Inc. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2010cv14360
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Other:
ADAC Automotive, Petoskey Plastics, Inc., Morbark, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Connolly, William Beaumont Hospital - Grosse Pointe, The Dow Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
The Shane Group, Inc., Bradley A. Veneberg, Scott Steele and others
Intervenor:
Priority Health Insurance Company, Spectrum Health Systems, CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Chew et al v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv03090
Plaintiff:
Janice Chew and Hull S. Chew
Defendant:
Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., BRP US Inc., Bombadier Motor Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Chew et al v. Hi-Lex Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv01930
Plaintiff:
Hull S. Chew and Janice Chew
Defendant:
Hi-Lex Corporation and Nippon Cable Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
