Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hamdo v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Morhaf Hamdo
Defendant:
FNU Rivera, FNU Higgins, DC Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Newberry et al
as 4:2019cv00479
Defendant:
Allison Higgins, Don Newberry, Alisa Scraper and others
Plaintiff:
Marquise Leland White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Winrow v. Higgins et al
as 5:2013cv00546
Petitioner:
John Calvin Winrow, Jr
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00527
Petitioner:
Tony L McKnight
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toles v. Higgins et al
as 5:2013cv00273
Petitioner:
Johnnie R Toles
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prochaska v. Higgins et al
as 6:2011cv00059
Petitioner:
Raymond Prochaska
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prochaska v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01385
Petitioner:
Raymond Prochaska
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis
Defendant:
Haskell Higgins, Phil Gilstrap, Matt Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prochaska v. Higgins et al
as 5:2010cv01090
Petitioner:
Raymond Prochaska
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
