Cases 41 - 50 of 251
Seyler v. Higgins AG, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
William Todd Seyler
Defendant:
Higgins AG LLC, Brent M. Higgins, Marianne Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Seyler v. Higgins AG LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
William Todd Seyler
Defendant:
Higgins AG LLC, Brent M. Higgins and Marianne Higgins
Pinson v. Cheatham, et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham, J. Taylor, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sykes v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2021cv00619
Plaintiff:
Dorian Trevor Sykes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ms. FNU Clemons-Stephens, Dr. Wendy White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02830
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME HIGGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgins v. Miami Dade County, FL et al
as 1:2021cv23882
Plaintiff:
Paulletta N. Higgins
Defendant:
Miami Dade County, FL and U. S. Dept. of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
HIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67650
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HIGGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65307
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH S HIGGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64528
Plaintiff:
CODY HIGGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56660
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIGGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
