Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
SOLIS v. MONOCACYFABS, INC. et al
as 5:2011cv06949
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: MONOCACYFABS, INC., MICHAEL POOLE, JEAN SHIPLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv06393
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SOLIS v. SINGLEY et al
as 2:2011cv05175
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: J. BRANT SINGLEY, BRADLEY WEISS and J.M. SINGLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SOLIS v. DEWESE et al
as 2:2011cv04509
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: HARRIS M. DEWESE, COMPASS CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD. and COMPASS CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD. DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SOLIS v. OCEAN KING ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03389
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: OCEAN KING ENTERPRISES, INC., OCEAN SIGNATURE CO., LABOR SOURCE AND SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SOLIS v. JANBRIDGE, INC.
as 2:2010cv07173
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: JANBRIDGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv05475
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SOLIS v. WEE LOVE EVEN MORE DAYCARE, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04474
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: WEE LOVE EVEN MORE DAYCARE, LLC, WEE LOVE DAY CARE, INC. and DEIDRE JONES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SOLIS v. DAMPMAN et al
as 2:2010cv04094
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: MARK D. DAMPMAN, WAYNE K. HALL, RENEUXIT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SOLIS et al v. MORGAN
as 2:2010cv02409
Plaintiff: HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant: MICHAEL G. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?