Cases 1 - 10 of 28
JOHNSON WELDED PRODUCTS, INC et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
JOHNSON WELDED PRODUCTS, INC and LILLI JOHNSON
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
GILARDI et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS A. GILARDI , PHILIP M. GILARDI , FRESH UNLIMITED INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , KATHLEEN G. SEBELIUS , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Movant:
STATE OF OHIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
SCOTT v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2012cv02055
Plaintiff:
ANNE L. SCOTT
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS and GARY A. STEINBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AMERICA SAFETY COUNCIL v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2012cv00631
Petitioner:
CLICKSAFETY.COM. INC.
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS and DAVID MICHAELS
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SAFETY COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOLIS
as 1:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GUERRERO-SMITH v. SOLIS
as 1:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
LENORA GUERRERO-SMITH
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
BRENNAN et al v. SOLIS
as 1:2011cv01448
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BRENNAN and CHARLES RIGHTNOWAR
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
