Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
HITCHCOCK v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69192
Plaintiff: MELVIN D HITCHCOCK
Defendant: CAREY CANADA, INC. and CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HITCHCOCK v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69191
Plaintiff: MELVIN D HITCHCOCK
Defendant: CAREY CANADA, INC. and CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HITCHCOCK v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61300
Plaintiff: NELSON A. HITCHCOCK, NELSON A. HITCHCOCK, NELSON A. HITCHCOCK and others
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HITCHCOCK v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92736
Plaintiff: MELVIN D HITCHCOCK
Defendant: A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC. v. IMMUCOR, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03953
Plaintiff: MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC., MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC., MARY HITCHCOCK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC. and others
Defendant: IMMUCOR, INC. and ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Type: Other Statutes None
HITCHCOCK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00551
Plaintiff: JERRY K. HITCHCOCK
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HITCHCOCK v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71757
Plaintiff: DOROTHY C. HITCHCOCK
Defendant: ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?