Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Amsden v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00468
Plaintiff:
Nathan Amsden
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Amsden v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00467
Plaintiff:
Nathan Amsden
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Morris, et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
William T. Gover and Frank Morris
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Home Depot, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pezzano v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv00578
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and US Maintenance, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Pezzano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
