Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. et al v. Reolink Innovation Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. and ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Reolink Innovation Inc., Reolink Innovation Co., Ltd, Amazon.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Shaw v. Andritz Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Ralph Elliott Shaw and Joan Sanderson Shaw
Defendant:
Andritz Inc., Baker Hughes Incorporated, Bay Valley Pulp and Paper Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Gardner Denver Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Gardner Denver Inc., Andritz Inc., Baker Hughes Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Antennatech LLC v. Home Depot Inc.
as 1:2014cv00819
Plaintiff:
Antennatech LLC
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
LED Tech Development LLC v. Home Depot USA Inc.
as 1:2012cv01260
Plaintiff:
LED Tech Development LLC
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Data Carriers LLC v. Home Depot Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00950
Plaintiff:
Data Carriers LLC
Defendant:
Home Depot Inc. and Home Depot USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Execware LLC v. Homer TLC Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Execware LLC
Defendant:
Homer TLC Inc. , Home Depot USA Inc. and Home Depot Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dorsey et al v. Home Depot USA Inc.
as 1:2009cv00594
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dorsey and Brenda Dorsey
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America et al v. Home Depot USA Inc.
as 1:2008cv00115
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Colorado
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
