Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank v. RealFi Home Funding Corp.
as 7:2023cv07438
Plaintiff:
FDIC Acting as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank
Defendant:
REALFI HOME FUNDING CORP. and Residential Home Funding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
D'Ascoli et al v. Residential Home Funding Corp.
as 2:2019cv01449
Plaintiff:
Paul D'Ascoli, Richard Rosenberg and Stephen Schoffman
Defendant:
Residential Home Funding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09176
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08986
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United States of America v. Residential Home Funding Corp.
as 2:2017cv07192
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Residential Home Funding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Parejas v. General Electric Capital Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03348
Defendant:
"Joe Doe #1" through "John Doe #10", Chase Home Finance, LLC, General Electric Capital Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Parejas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
