Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff: Ali Ader
Defendant: NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
Ballard v. Eidos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant: William Lis, Suzanne Sawochka Hooper, Neil Kumar and others
Plaintiff: William Ballard
Bushansky v. Eidos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv09308
Defendant: William Lis, Eidos Therapeutics, Inc., Neil Kumar and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Kerry v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02535
Defendant: Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Edwin B. Hooper III and others
Plaintiff: Mark Kerry
Wang v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv02511
Defendant: Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Dr. Sam Heidari and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Clarke v. Quantenna Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02508
Defendant: Mark A. Stevens, Quantenna Communications, Inc., Jack Lazar and others
Plaintiff: Gerald Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bushansky v. Gigamon Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv06842
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Defendant: Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Tonfack v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06845
Plaintiff: Fulgence Tonfack
Defendant: Gigamon Inc., Paul A. Hooper, Arthur W. Coviello, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stouffer v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv06789
Plaintiff: Spencer Stouffer
Defendant: Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sharpenter v. Gigamon Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv06755
Plaintiff: Ted Sharpenter
Defendant: Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?