Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Pratt v. Hall
as 23-40240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Herbert Hoover Pratt, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Alvis Hall, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Beto I, William Wheat, Assistant Warden, Beto I, Amy Oliver, Program Supervisor and others
USA v. Palacios Caicedo
as 23-40225
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Hubert Palacios Caicedo, also known as Hoover, also known as Uber
Pratt v. Martinez
as 22-40274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Herbert Hoover Pratt, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Miguel Martinez, Region IV Director and Gene Miller, Assistant Warden, McConnell Unit
Hoover Panel Systems v. HAT Contract
as 21-11200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hoover Panel Systems, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee:
HAT Contract, Incorporated, also known as HAT Contract, L.L.C.
Hoover v. Allstate TX Lloyd's
as 21-20527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael J. Hoover
Defendant / Appellee:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's
Gordon Hoover v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 20-20211
Petitioner / Appellant:
GORDON GLENN HOOVER
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rosa Serrano v. Mary Comstok-King, et al
as 19-50667
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN HUGHES, Eleventh Court of Appeals, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JAIME ESPARZA, District Attorney, MARY COMSTOK-KING, Warden, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSA SERRANO
Hoover Pugh, Jr. v. J. Lopez, et al
as 19-20490
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF OF OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, J. LOPEZ, Regional Director, A. THOMPSON, Sec. Rep. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOOVER PUGH, JR.
Hoover Panel Systems, Inc. v. HAT Contract, Incorporated
as 19-10702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HOOVER PANEL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant:
HAT CONTRACT, INCORPORATED
Hoover Panel Systems, Inc. v. HAT Contract, Incorporated
as 19-10650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOOVER PANEL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
HAT CONTRACT, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
