Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Shorter et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01874
Plaintiff:
Bernard Shorter and Gertrude Shorter
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
William J. Lee, Sr. and Shirley Lee
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc., Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyd v. MCIC, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03311
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Boyd and Dorothy Boyd
Defendant:
MCIC, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Rapid American Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
McCurdy et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02681
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McCurdy and Anna McCurdy
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
RPM, Inc., Crane Co., JH France Refractories Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Heating Products Co., Crane Co., Georgia-Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Lester et al v. Anchor Packing Company et al
as 1:2007cv02392
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Lester, Charles Edward Lester, Betty Jean Lester and others
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Company, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, General Electric Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Warfield et al v. Northrop Gruman Ship Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01870
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Warfield, James Samuel Warfield, Alda Smith-Warfield and others
Defendant:
Northrop Gruman Ship Systems, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., General Refactories, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
