Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Devoris James, Danny Horton, Anthony Gipson and others
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Ernest Pickens, Megan Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Mayes et al
as 3:2021cv00746
Plaintiff:
Danny J Horton
Defendant:
Mayes, William Hyatte and Porters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mayes et al
as 1:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Danny J Horton
Defendant:
Mayes, William Hyatte and Porters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miltenberger v. Marshall County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2020cv00682
Defendant:
Kraning A. C., Marshall County Sheriffs Department and Horton
Plaintiff:
Charles J Miltenberger, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glassman v. Hassell et al
as 3:2019cv01160
Defendant:
Matthew Hassell, Mary Loftus, Dr. Tchapchet and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Glassman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00732
Defendant:
Trudy, Matthew Hassel, Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00734
Defendant:
Trudy, Crawford, Horton and others
Plaintiff:
David William Boone Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kyle Smith, Joe Riley, Greg Robinson and others
Defendant:
CLU Screening, Ken Faulk, Reggie Nevels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Griffin et al
as 3:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Danny J Horton
Defendant:
Kathy L. Griffin and Sharon Hawk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
