Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Mead v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv01962
Plaintiff:
Michael Mead
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corely v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv01677
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetzel v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv01550
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Bobby Jindal, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00349
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartshorn v. Prince
as 2:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Hartshorn
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billard v. Prince et al
as 3:2012cv00286
Petitioner:
Thomas Billard
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Howard Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratcliff v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv01142
Plaintiff:
Elbert James Ratcliff, III
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv00855
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coston v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv00745
Plaintiff:
Stanley Coston
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
