Cases 1 - 10 of 10
THOMPSON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOLING v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
OLIVER M. BOLING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PAMELA POSCH, KATHLEEN A. PINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WORTHAM v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
RONALD WORTHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., STEPHEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES, JR. v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, US PAROLE COMMISSION, GARY WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE-EL v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01678
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO LOVE-EL
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHEN T. NASKO, STEVEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTYRE v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01520
Plaintiff:
DARREN MCINTYRE
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, SCOTT KUBIC, JOSEPH PACHOLSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BAILEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2010cv00463
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUESDALE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al
as 1:2008cv01862
Plaintiff:
ALVIN B. TRUESDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.