Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Jeffrey Stofle v. I. Clay
as 11-16027
Petitioner - Appellant: JEFFREY C. STOFLE
Respondent - Appellee: I. D. CLAY
Campbell v. Clay, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01914
Petitioner: Maurice Edward Campbell
Respondent: I. D. Clay, Matthew Martel , Frank X. Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robin Sanderson v. I. Clay
as 09-17465
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBIN R. SANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee: I. D. CLAY, Warden
McDaniel v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01809
Petitioner: Robert McDaniel
Respondent: I. D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02693
Petitioner: Robert McDaniel
Respondent: I. D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Twyne v. Clay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02120
Petitioner: Shawn Andre Twyne
Respondent: I D Clay and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abner Lister v. Secretary/Director of Californ, et al
as 09-16520
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABNER HAYNES LISTER
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY/DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION REHABILITATION, Z. ALLEN and I. D. CLAY, Warden
Stofle v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02847
Petitioner: Jeffrey C. Stofle
Respondent: I. D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Alford v. I. Clay
as 09-16174
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS T. ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee: I. D. CLAY, Warden of SCC
Campbell v. Clay We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv02378
Petitioner: Maurice Edward Campbell
Respondent: I. D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?