Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Diaz v. IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Diaz
Defendant:
IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc. and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Diaz v. IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Diaz
Defendant:
IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc. and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Ancheta v. Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc et al
as 5:2010cv05589
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ancheta
Defendant:
Golden Empire Mortgage, Inc, First American Title Company, Aurora Loan Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
IBM ThinkPad, serial number L3-C4192
as 2:2010mj02941
Defendant:
IBM ThinkPad, serial number L3-C4192 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. IBM ThinkPad, serial number L3-C4192
as 2:2010mj02941
Defendant:
IBM ThinkPad, serial number L3-C4192 (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Donald G. Nott v. IBM Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv07450
Defendant:
Does and IBM Corporation
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Nott
Baum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv04280
Plaintiff:
Nancy Baum
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and IBM Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Prichard v. Metroplitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv03313
Plaintiff:
Matthew Prichard
Defendant:
Metroplitan Life Insurance Company and The IBM Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Prichard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv03313
Plaintiff:
Matthew Prichard
Defendant:
Metroplitan Life Insurance Company and The IBM Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
USA v. One IBM ThinkPad Laptop Computer, Serial Number 78-CCPXZ
as 2:2010mj01837
Defendant:
One IBM ThinkPad Laptop Computer, Serial Number 78-CCPXZ (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
