Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Bancroft Life & Casualty ICC, v. Cesar Scolari
as 13-36153
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
BANCROFT LIFE & CASUALTY ICC, LTD, a corporation organized under the laws of St. Lucia
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
CESAR SCOLARI, an individual
Martha v. Contra Costa County
as 3:2013cv05401
Petitioner:
George Nimer Martha
Respondent:
ICC Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Sheridan v. Brent Reinke, et al
as 13-35999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHERIDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT REINKE, CMS, DBA Corizon, Inc., PHILIP VALDEZ and others
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 13-35306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, JOHN FERGUSON, STEVE GARETT and others
Eddie Corrales v. M. Vega, et al
as 13-55408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE CORRALES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. VEGA, Assistant Institutional Gang Investigator (IGI), A. ROMAN, Assistant Institutional Gang Investigator Lieutenant, G. SANDOR, Institution Classification Committee (ICC) Chairperson and others
Mansell v. MTC ICC Capps Facility
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Alan Mansell
Defendant:
MTC ICC Capps Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Richard M Caldwell
Defendant:
IDOC, ICC, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Hayes v. Kathy Radford
as 12-35899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY RADFORD, Mail Room Supervisor of ICC
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 12-35642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, JOHN FERGUSON, CEO, CCA, IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Hayes v. ICC-CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
ICC-CCA , IDOC , Shannon Cluney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
