Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Solis-Martinez v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Rebecca Adducci, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Cristhian Jared Solis-Martinez
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and others
Arega v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2019cv02905
Respondent:
DHS/ICE and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Tizazu F. Arega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arega v. DHS/ICE
as 2:2018cv01714
Defendant:
DHS/ICE
Plaintiff:
Tizazu F. Arega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00562
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Yahya v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 2:2017cv01073
Petitioner:
Tunkara Yahya
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Director, U.S. ICE Field Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zheng v. Sessions et al
as 4:2017cv02509
Petitioner:
Wei-Dong Zheng
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions and DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yahya v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2017cv01021
Petitioner:
Tunkara Yahya
Respondent:
Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Director, U.S Ice Field and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wei Tong v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2017cv01004
Petitioner:
Wu Wei Tong
Respondent:
Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Directror, U.S Ice Field and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Khaleghi v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv00377
Petitioner:
Seyed Arash Khaleghi
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oumar v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2016cv01150
Petitioner:
Diallo Oumar
Respondent:
US Attorney General and DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
