Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Andersen et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Levi Andersen and Marissa Andersen
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, State of Idaho, City of Meridian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kim Hyde-Rhodes v. Idaho Department of Health
as 21-35717
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE-RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & WELFARE
Miller v. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare et al
as 1:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Shellie R Miller and Shelly R Miller
Defendant:
Todd Hurt, Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, State Hospital North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Khurana et al
as 3:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
State of Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
Defendant:
Praveen Khurana and John W Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rodrick DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel, et al
as 14-35534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRICK GORDON DEROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT-NEXTEL, BOISE CITY, ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rodrick DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel, et al
as 12-35849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRICK GORDON DEROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT-NEXTEL, BOISE CITY, ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
DeRock v. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
as 1:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Rodrick G DeRock
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
V&T Mental Health Services, Inc v. State of Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
as 4:2008cv00238
Plaintiff:
V&T Mental Health Services Inc
Defendant:
State of Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
