Cases 1 - 10 of 42
United States of America v. Approximately 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange account associated with user id 3
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange account associated with user id 3 and Approx 32.68342694 Bitcoin (and funds derived therefrom) formerly held in wallet address 1G3pyCCFENTp8EHANrGBpmEKNobPqA5CLg, seized from a Binance.com exchange acct associated with user id 395972026
Interested Party:
Advocus National Title Insurance Company doing business as Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Sarly et al v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00048
Defendant:
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Carana Sarly and Ma Si Roh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Huebner v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Huebner
Defendant:
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company f/n/a IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Zuleta Orruel v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
ZULETA ORRUEL and Dennis Zuleta Orruel
Defendant:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, John/Jane Does 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Williams v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Linda Williams
Defendant:
American Family Connect Property Casualty Insurance formerly doing business as Ameriprise Auto and Home Insurance, IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company and American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company formerly doing business as Ameriprise Auto and Home Insurance and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05178
Plaintiff:
Linda Williams
Defendant:
American Family Connect Property Casualty Insurance, IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company and American Family Connect Property Casualty Insurance formerly doing business as Ameriprise Auto and Home Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dezell et al v. Beltz et al
as 3:2021cv05687
Plaintiff:
Robert Dezell and Deborah Dezell
Defendant:
Patsy Beltz, John Doe Beltz and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woelfle v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv01073
Plaintiff:
Donald Woelfle
Defendant:
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company, John D Pavlic, IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodpaster et al v. American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv05116
Plaintiff:
Jenise Goodpaster and Steve Goodpaster
Defendant:
Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance, American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Company v. Samra
as 2:2020cv01568
Plaintiff:
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company and IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pritpal Samra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
