Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Nelda Kellom, et al v. Mitchell Quinn, et al
as 22-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NELDA KELLOM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of TERRANCE KELLOM, Deceased, KEVIN KELLOM, Individually, TERIA KELLOM, Individually and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MITCHELL QUINN, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agent, TREVA EATON, individually and in her official capacity as a Detroit Police Officer, DARELL FITZGERALD, individually and in his official capacity as a Detroit Police Officer and others
Rustem Kazazi, et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot, et al
as 19-3270
Respondent:
RONALD D. VITIELLO, Actin Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Commissioner, US Customs and Border Protection and others
Petitioner:
RUSTEM KAZAZI, LEJLA KAZAZI and ERALD KAZAZI
Angel Escobar, et al v. Lee Gaines, et al
as 14-6362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANGEL ENRIQUE NUNEZ ESCOBAR, JESUS ANTONIO SANCHEZ VILLALOBOS, JORGE PALENCIA SARMIENTO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE GAINES, Supervisory Detention and Deportation Officer, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") Nashville Fugitive Operations Team ("NVLFOT"), GARY KEMPER, Sergeant, Metropolitan Nashville Police Department ("MNPD") Gang Unit, et al., CHRISTOPHER KOSHAR, ICE Nashville Homeland Security Investigations ("NVLHSI") Group Supervisor and others
Angel Escobar, et al v. Lee Gaines, et al
as 14-6120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANGEL ENRIQUE NUNEZ ESCOBAR, JESUS ANTONIO SANCHEZ VILLALOBOS, JORGE PALENCIA SARMIENTO and others
Defendant:
LEE GAINES, Supervisory Detention and Deportation Officer, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") Nashville Fugitive Operations Team ("NVLFOT"), et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY KEMPER, Sergeant, Metropolitan Nashville Police Department ("MNPD") Gang Unit and SHAUN HARDIN, Detective, MPND Gang Unit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
