Cases 1 - 10 of 68,473
Alert Stamping and Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Acadia Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Alert Stamping and Mfg. Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Acadia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Whittington v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03226
Plaintiff:
Richard Whittington
Defendant:
National Seating & Mobility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paley v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03228
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanfield v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03223
Plaintiff:
Carlos Stanfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Besaw v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
Joseph Besaw
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lindsey v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03229
Plaintiff:
Leemon Lindsey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carlin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03230
Plaintiff:
Bruce Carlin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conz v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65698
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Conz
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
