Cases 1 - 4 of 4
KNOWLES v. M & H REFRACTORY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 1:2017cv01146
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND (AS SUCCESSOR TO BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND), BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, INDIANA BRICKLAYERS LOCAL #4 INDIANA/KENTUCKY and others
Defendant:
M & H REFRACTORY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE OF THE BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT FUND et al v. EMPIRE REFRACTORY SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC.
as 1:2016cv02190
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND (AS SUCCESSOR TO BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND), BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, DAVID MURRAY, TRUSTEE OF THE BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF INDIANA and others
Defendant:
EMPIRE REFRACTORY SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KNOWLES et al v. MCLAUGHLIN MASONRY, LLC
as 1:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, INDIANA BRICKLAYERS LOCAL #4 INDIANA/KENTUCKY and others
Defendant:
MCLAUGHLIN MASONRY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. DEGRELLA TILE, INC.
as 1:2015cv01416
As Successor To Briklayers Of Indiana Health And Welfare Fund:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, INDIANA BRICKLAYERS LOCAL #4 INDIANA/KENTUCKY and INDIANA BRICKLAYERS LOCAL 4 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING COMMITTEE
Defendant:
DEGRELLA TILE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
