Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv02379
Defendant:
Mckesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Proctor, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv02190
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Proctor, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of North St. Paul, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv01995
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of North St. Paul, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pine County, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv01907
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Pine County, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Rochester, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv01317
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Rochester, City of and City of Rochester, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2019cv01274
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sherman v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2018cv03335
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy C. Sherman and Darcy Sherman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Hennepin County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 0:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.