Cases 31 - 35 of 35
USA ex rel INTL. BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS V. THE FAIRFIELD CO.
as 5:2009cv04230
Defendant:
THE FARFIELD COMPANY
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO.98
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 98 et al v. CHISOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
as 2:2009cv02793
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 98, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN and others
Defendant:
CHISOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. ELLIOT-LEWIS CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv01599
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
ELLIOT-LEWIS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. CHISOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05684
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PENSION PLAN, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 98 PROFIT SHARING PLAN and others
Defendant:
CHISOM ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, INC. and EDDIE M. CHISOM, SR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cm Comm Inc v. NLRB
as 01-1401
Petitioner:
Commonwealth Communications, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 98
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
