Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Irwin Hicks, Jr. v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 22-11418
Petitioner / Appellant:
IRWIN HICKS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hicks v. Florida Attorney General et al(Lake County)
as 5:2021cv00360
Petitioner:
Irwin Hicks, Jr.
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. State of Florida Department of Corrections
as 5:2021cv00172
Defendant:
State of Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Irwin Hicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irwin Hicks, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-14818
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
IRWIN HICKS, JR.
HICKS v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00430
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, LIBERTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and MCCROSKEY
Plaintiff:
IRWIN HICKS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00379
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES and LIBERTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff:
IRWIN HICKS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00419
Defendant:
Liberty CI, Julie L. Jones and FNU Mecroskey
Plaintiff:
Irwin Hicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irwin Hicks, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-14964
Petitioner - Appellant:
IRWIN HICKS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hicks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2017cv00117
Petitioner:
Irwin Hicks, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Defendant:
Gary Borders and Don F. Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HICKS v. JONES
as 4:2017cv00090
Petitioner:
IRWIN HICKS, JR
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
