Cases 1 - 8 of 8
The Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation v. State of Idaho Department of Fish and Game, et al.
as 4:2021cv00252
Defendant:
State of Idaho Department of Fish and Game, State of Idaho, Greg Wooten and others
Plaintiff:
The Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Stephen Tanner, I v. Willie Cowell, et al
as 20-35886
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS SWANSON, VIRGIL MOORE, WILLIE COWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN A. TANNER I
Steve Tanner v. Willie Cowell, et al
as 19-35854
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCAS SWANSON, VIRGIL MOORE, WILLIE COWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE TANNER and STEPHEN A. TANNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ralph Maughan, et al v. Tom Vilsack, et al
as 14-35043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH MAUGHAN, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM VILSACK, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, NORA RASURE, Regional Forester of Region Four of the U.S. Forest Service and others
Hall v. Idaho Department of Fish and Game et al
as 1:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Roland Hall
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Fish and Game , Rick Bogar and Robert Soumas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf Recovery Foundation, et al v. USFS, et al
as 11-35243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOLF RECOVERY FOUNDATION and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Plaintiff:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and ASDA APHIS WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Murray v. State of Idaho et al
as 4:2007cv00168
Plaintiff:
Blaine Murray
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Charlie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
