Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund v. Federal Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv02137
Plaintiff:
Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund et al v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv08019
Plaintiff:
Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund , University of Wisconsin Credit Union , Harvard Savings Bank and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Pennant Management, Inc. et al v. First Farmers Financial LLC et al
as 2:2015mc00231
Movant:
Patrick Cavanaugh, Foley and Lardner LLP, Harvard Savings Bank and others
Defendant:
First Farmers Financial, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pennant Management, Inc.
Pennant Management, Inc. et al v. First Farmers Financial LLC et al
as 1:2015mc01014
Plaintiff:
Pennant Management, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund, Harvard Savings Bank
Defendant:
First Farmers Financial LLC, Nikesh Ajay Patel, Timothy Glenn Fisher and others
Receiver:
Patrick Cavanaugh
In Re: First Farmers Financial Litigation
as 1:2014cv07581
Claimant:
PSI Water Control, Inc., Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC, Third Eye Vision Corporation, Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States, The, Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund and Harvard Illinois Bancorp, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven Standley, Alena Hospitality LBV, LLC, Able Connection, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Encore Bank, Pennant Management, Inc., Michael Nanosky and others
Receiver:
Patrick D. Cavanaugh
Counter Claimant:
Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A. and Patrick Cavanaugh
Petitioner:
Foley & Lardner LLP
Intervenor:
Kenner & Greenfield and Truline Contracting & Remodeling Inc.
Respondent:
Davenport Ventures II, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Orlando International Hotels, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
