Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NDONGA v. EMPOWR.COM et al
as 7:2020cv00028
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, EMPOWR.COM and others
Plaintiff:
MBETI VICTORIA NDONGA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLATAN et al v. CLAYTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 7:2019cv00199
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CLAYTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
SPINDY CHARLATAN and MARIE SAINVIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOODWORTH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAMAR BLOODWORTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00094
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00129
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00049
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00101
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
St. John-Thompson v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00116
Petitioner:
Christopher St. John-Thompson
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Immigration & Customs Enforcement Ditrict Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
