Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Abdirahman Kariye, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 23-55790
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABDIRAHMAN ADEN KARIYE, MOHAMAD MOUSLLI and HAMEEM SHAH
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, STEVE K. FRANCIS, Acting Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations, in his official capacity and others
Defendant: MARK MORGAN, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Andrew Hango v. ICE, et al
as 23-55384
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW S. HANGO
Defendant / Appellee: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WARDEN, Seneca County Jail, DOES, Ohio Unknown Medical Staff and others
Rubia Morales-Alfaro v. USA, et al
as 23-55200
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUBIA MABEL MORALES-ALFARO
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CORECIVIC, INC.
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Mark Brnovich, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15518
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA, AL REBLE and others
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16276
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee: DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant: NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Ms. L., et al v. ICE, et al
as 18-56151
Petitioner - Appellee: MS. L. and MS. C.
Respondent - Appellant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Xochitl Hernandez, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56829
Plaintiff - Appellee: XOCHITL HERNANDEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals and CESAR MATIAS, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals
Defendant - Appellant: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
J. F.M., et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35738
Plaintiff - Appellee: J. E. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend, Bob Ekblad, J. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend Bob Ekblad, D. G. F.M., a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Bob Ekblad and others
Defendant - Appellant: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FORMER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES and others
Ignacio Lanuza v. Jonathan Love We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35408
Plaintiff - Appellant: IGNACIO LANUZA
Defendant - Appellee: JONATHAN M. LOVE, Assistant Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae - Pending: AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD
Jasmine Rangel, et al v. USA, et al
as 10-36145
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASMINE RANGEL and ROGELIO MORENO-GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEAD TASK FORCE, YAKIMA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?