Cases 1 - 10 of 68,494
Pavlisin v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65700
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pavlisin
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burks v. Walmart Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Leanne Burks
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Sam's West, Inc. and Premium Waters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ease Logistics Services, LLC v. Ray's Transport, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03240
Plaintiff:
Ease Logistics Services, LLC
Defendant:
Ray's Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Quantum Health, Inc. v. PB Restaurants, LLC
as 2:2024cv03233
Plaintiff:
Quantum Health, Inc.
Defendant:
PB Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Astacio v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
Julio Astacio
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crocker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
Barbara Crocker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fansler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03244
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fansler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Castillo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03245
Plaintiff:
Ronald Castillo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03241
Plaintiff:
Karleen D Hart
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rawers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03242
Plaintiff:
Michael A Rawers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
