Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stokes, et al v. United States
as 21-7047
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALEXIS STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor and TAYLOR STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Indian Health Service & Chickasaw Nation Medical Center, an agency of the Chickasaw Nation
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Becerra, et al
as 21-8046
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE
Defendant / Appellee: NORRIS COCHRAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ELIZABETH FOWLER, in her official capacity as Acting Director, Indian Health Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Stokes, et al v. United States
as 19-7035
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Indian Health Service & Chickasaw Nation Medical Center, an agency of the Chickasaw Nation
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALEXIS STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor and TAYLOR STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor
Stokes, et al v. United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-7034
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Indian Health Service & Chickasaw Nation Medical Center, an agency of the Chickasaw Nation
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALEXIS STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor and TAYLOR STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor
Ramah Navajo School Board v. Sebelius, et al
as 14-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, YVETTE ROUBIDEAUX, Director of the Indian Health Service, RICHIE K. GRINNELL, Assistant Surgeon General, Indian Health Services, Albuquerque Area Director and others
Ramah Navajo School Board v. Sebelius, et al
as 14-2051
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, YVETTE ROUBIDEAUX, Director of the Indian Health Service, RICHIE K. GRINNELL, Assistant Surgeon General, Indian Health Services, Albuquerque Area Director and others
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Sebelius, et al
as 09-2291
Plaintiff - Appellee: SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Appellant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, RICHARD H. CARMONA, Surgeon General of the United States, CHARLES W. GRIM, Assistant Surgeon General and Director of the Indian Health Service and others
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2281
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, RICHARD H. CARMONA, Surgeon General of the United States, CHARLES W. GRIM, Assistant Surgeon General and Director of the Indian Health Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Leavitt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2274
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, RICHARD H. CARMONA, Surgeon General of the United States, CHARLES W. GRIM, Assistant Surgeon General and Director of the Indian Health Service and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?