Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Innovative Automation LLC v. Midwest Tape LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
Midwest Tape LLC and Hoopla LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Innovative Automation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02124
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation, LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Slacker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Innovative Automation LLC v. Scribd Inc et al
as 2:2015mc00003
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
Scribd Inc
Movant:
Draft2Digital LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Harpercollins Publishers, LLC -V- Innovative Automation LLC
as 1:2015mc00306
Plaintiff:
Harpercollins Publisher, LLC
Defendant:
Innovative Automation LLC
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Innovative Automation LLC v. Scribd Inc et al
as 5:2015cv01018
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
Scribd Inc
Movant:
Draft2Digital LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Innovative Automation LLC v. Disney Online Inc.
as 2:2015cv01336
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
Disney Online Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Innovative Automation LLC v. 3M Company
as 2:2015cv01334
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Innovative Automation LLC v. Plex, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01337
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
Plex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Innovative Automation LLC v. Baker & Taylor, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01335
Defendant:
Baker & Taylor, LLC and K-NFB Reading Technology Inc.
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Innovative Automation, LLC v. Inkling Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation, LLC
Defendant:
Inkling Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
