Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Jackson v. Intel Corporation
as 2:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Philip Jackson
Defendant:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hillwood Enterprises, L.P. v. Intel Corporation
as 4:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Hillwood Enterprises, L.P.
Defendant:
Intel Corporation and Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WI-Lan, Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
WI-Lan, Inc., WI-Lan, Inc. and WI-Lan, Inc.
Defendant:
Acer, Inc., Acer, Inc., Acer, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Circuit City Stores, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
WI-Lan, Inc., WI-Lan, Inc., WI-Lan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WI-Lan, Inc. v. Westell Technologies, Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00474
Plaintiff:
WI-Lan, Inc.
Defendant:
Westell Technologies, Inc, Netgear, Inc., 2Wire, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Amalgamated Bank et al v. Dell, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Amalgamated Bank, Amalgamated Bank, Amalgamated Bank and others
Defendant:
Dell, Inc., Michael S. Dell, Kevin B. Rollins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Intel Corporation et al v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
as 6:2006cv00551
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Philip Patterson and Robert W Faulkner
Plaintiff:
Intel Corporation and Dell Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Petitioner:
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Marvell Asia Pte Ltd, Marvell Intl Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Northrop Grumman v. Intel Corporation, et al
as 1:2000cv00652
Not Classified By Court:
Robert M Parker
Special Master:
Gaynell C Methvin
Plaintiff:
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Defendant:
Intel Corporation, 3Com Corporation, Xircom Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
