Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2020cv02439
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Salyer v. Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
as 6:2019cv01140
Plaintiff:
Randall G. Salyer
Defendant:
United States of America and Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Hecht v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2017cv04118
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Hecht
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Hattrup v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2017cv04083
Plaintiff:
Scott Gregory Hattrup
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Julia Deng and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7433
Donaldson vs. United States Department of Treasury, et al.
as 6:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Donaldson
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and Mark Boston
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
McKinzy v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2013cv02474
Plaintiff:
Michael E. McKinzy, Sr.
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Farmer (ID 102981) v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2013cv01188
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Farmer
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Meuli v. Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
as 6:2013cv01114
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Meuli
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7433 IRS: Unauthorized Collection Action
Campbell v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2013cv02066
Plaintiff:
Jerry Campbell
Defendant:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Meuli v. Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
as 6:2012cv01015
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Meuli
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7433
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
