Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Amentum Special Mission Services, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 199
as 1:2021cv00839
Plaintiff:
Amentum Special Mission Services, Inc.
Defendant:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 199
Board of Trustees of the Health and Welfare Trust Fund for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 99 and 99A v. CAO DAC Corporation
as 1:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Health and Welfare Trust Fund for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 99 and 99A
Defendant:
CAO DAC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Health & Welfare Fund for the International Union of Operating Engineer Local 99 and 99A v. CAO DAC Corporation
as 1:2019cv01307
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Health & Welfare Fund for IUOE Local 99 & 99A and Board of Trustees of the Health and Welfare Trust Fund for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 99 and 99A
Defendant:
CAO DAC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 99 v. CAO DAC Corporation
as 1:2018cv01476
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 99
Defendant:
CAO DAC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00130
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Aecom Special Missions Services, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 99
as 1:2016cv01262
Plaintiff:
AECOM Special Missions Services, Inc.
Defendant:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 99
Counter_claimant:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 99
Counter_defendant:
AECOM Special Missions Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, William H. Bolinder, Gaylord Kent Conrad and others
Petitioner:
David Pinkoski, Richard L. Salberg and Martin Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Salberg v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00517
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Salberg
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, Michael P. Klein, Michael D. Frazier and others
Petitioner:
Martin Cohen and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Cohen v. McInerney et al
as 3:2015cv00504
Plaintiff:
Martin Cohen
Defendant:
Thomas J. McInerney, Martin P. Klein, William H. Bolinder and others
Petitioner:
David Pinkoski and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
