Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
Michael Fiorito v. Warden J. Fikes
as 23-1006
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden J. Fikes
Timmy Reichling v. T.J. Fikes, et al
as 22-2366
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timmy J. Reichling
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. Fikes, Warden, Dr. Ann LaValley-Wood, Chief Psychologist, D. Drillings, Correctional Officer and others
Respondent:
Dr. Warlick, Staff Psychologist, R. Zaudkte, Correctional Officer, T. Scullard, Correctional Officer and others
Antwoyn Spencer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-3490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antwoyn Terrell Spencer
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Warden J. Fikes, Captain Warlick and others
Delawn M. Prince v. Warden J. Fikes
as 21-2622
Petitioner / Appellant:
Delawn M. Prince
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden J. Fikes
Dana Kidd, Jr. v. J. Fikes
as 20-3628
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dana Enoch Kidd, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden J. Fikes
Brandon Dalton v. J. Fikes, et al
as 20-3475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Dalton
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden J. Fikes, FCI - Sandstone
James T. Smith v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 20-2229
Respondent / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi and J. Fikes
Petitioner / Appellant:
James T. Smith
Antwoyn Spencer v. J. Fikes
as 19-2883
Petitioner / Appellant:
Antwoyn Terrell Spencer
Respondent / Appellee:
J. Fikes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
