Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Toy Smith v. J. Torres, et al
as 19-17042
Defendant / Appellee:
M. HOGGARD, Correctional Counselor, J. TORRES, Correctional Counselor and J. ACEBEDO, Correctional Captain
Defendant:
R. MICHAEL HUTCHINSON, J. LEWIS and J. GALLAGHER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOY TERRELL SMITH
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. J. Acebedo, et al
as 19-55180
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ACEBEDO, L. PARKER, (CSPR), Official and Individual Capacity, R. KNOWLES, Captain, Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ANTHONY GROUNDS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Derrick Oden, Sr. v. J. Acebedo, et al
as 19-15052
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK JESUS ODEN, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ACEBEDO, S. SWAIM and R. THOMAS
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ANTHONY GROUNDS
Larry King v. M. Biter, et al
as 18-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL KING
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, D. TARNOFF, J. ACEBEDO and others
Larry King v. M. Biter, et al
as 18-15743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL KING
Defendant - Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, D. TARNOFF, J. ACEBEDO and others
Shepard v. Borum et al
as 1:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Lamont Shepard
Defendant:
M. Borum and J. Acebedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Jesus Oden v. State of California, et al.
as 2:2017cv05639
Defendant:
J. Acebedo, Anthony Grounds, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jesus Oden, Sr
Shepard v. Borum et al
as 1:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Lamont Shepard
Defendant:
M. Borum and J. Acebedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2016cv01924
Plaintiff:
Toy Terrell Smith
Defendant:
R.M. Hutchinson, J. Lewis, J. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oden v. Director of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jesus Oden
Defendant:
Director of Corrections, Howls, Kelly Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
