Cases 11 - 20 of 27
PEPE v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv04848
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON PEPE
Defendant:
HUGH J. BURNS and SUSAN E. AFFRONTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 2:2013cv02556
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, HUGH J. BURNS, JR., JOHN W. PERSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv01122
Petitioner:
CHARLES PARKER
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HUGH J. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURNS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59347
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. BURNS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAWSON v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2011cv01030
Petitioner:
JAMEEL LAWSON
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HUGH J. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT - PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Piazza et al
as 1:2010cv01738
Plaintiff:
Eric Hall
Defendant:
Joseph Piazza, David Anthony, Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38948
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. BURNS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VU v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
NGUYEN VU
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JASON JOHN KEGEL, COREY ANTHONY MATTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUSICK v. LAWERENCE et al
as 2:2009cv05873
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant:
DAVID C. LAWERENCE, JOSEPH EVERS, VIVIAN T. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUSICK v. LAWERENCE et al
as 2:2009cv05581
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant:
DAVID C. LAWERENCE, JOSEPH EVERS, VIVIAN T. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
