Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
James Brown v. D. Woodward, et al
as 22-15144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RAY BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. WOODWARD, PREEZ, S. VILLARREAL and others
(PC) Robert Holmes v. Perez et al
as 1:2021cv01367
Plaintiff:
Robert Holmes
Defendant:
Perez, Rocha, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Bradford v. J. Ceballos, et al
as 21-15973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CEBALLOS, Appeals Coordinator, C. MUNOZ, Correctional Lieutenant and D. GOREE, Jr., Appeals Coordinator
Joshua Rogers v. R. Farley et al
as 2:2021cv03571
Defendant:
R. Ugalde, E. Artega, B. Burrows and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shikeb Saddozai v. J. Ceballos, et al
as 21-15376
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF C.D.C.R., KENT CLARK and J. CEBALLOS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
(PC) Bradford v. Ceballos et al
as 1:2020cv01821
Defendant:
D. Goree, Jr, J. Ceballos and C. Munoz
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Vargas v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2020cv02112
Defendant:
Josie Gonzales, Jesse Gonzales, C. E. Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Vargas, Jr. and Francisco Javier Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv01254
Defendant:
C. Bell, L. C. Hence, J. Ceballos and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Grant v. Ceballos et al
as 1:2020cv01056
Defendant:
L. Carrol, J. Ceballos, K. Field and others
Plaintiff:
Travare Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
