Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Peter Honesto v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-15072
Plaintiff - Appellant: PETER J. HONESTO, AKA Pedro Honesto
Defendant - Appellee: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, E. BROWN, Jr., J. HARTLEY and others
Thomas v. Goumas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff: Edward Lee Thomas
Defendant: J. Goumas, B. Desilagua, N. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Toliver v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-55038
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALFRED TOLIVER
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION and J. HARTLEY, Warden
Jesus Conchas v. J. Hartley
as 10-17914
Petitioner - Appellant: JESUS CONCHAS
Respondent - Appellee: J. HARTLEY, Warden
Robert Castle v. J. Hartley
as 10-17885
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT THOMAS CASTLE
Respondent - Appellee: J. HARTLEY, Warden
Honesto v. Schwarzenegger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05691
Plaintiff: Peter J. Honesto
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, E. Brown, Jr., J. Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Hartley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02305
Petitioner: Jesse Martinez
Respondent: J. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Hartley, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02260
Plaintiff: Robert E Thompson
Defendant: J. Hartley, R. Ndoh, L Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Le v. Hartley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02209
Petitioner: Dung Le
Respondent: J. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Shehata v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-56799
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK F. SHEHATA
Defendant - Appellee: MATTHEW CATE, Sec'y Dept of Correc., M. POULOS, Warden, CIM, J. HARTLEY, Warden, ASP and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?