Cases 1 - 10 of 79
(PC) Bradford v. Withrow et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Patrick Withrow, Samuel Cortez, Pattersson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lynch v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv01842
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Lynch
Defendant:
P. J. Jones, Brizindine, Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Puckett v. Barrios et al
as 1:2020cv01405
Defendant:
A. Duran, B. Lee, K. Lopez-Maldonado and others
Plaintiff:
Durrell Anthony Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Jones v. Sullivan
as 1:2019cv00477
Respondent:
Warden J. Sullivan
Petitioner:
William J Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Garcia v. Holland, et al.
as 1:2019cv00222
Defendant:
R. Escarcega, D. Mason, W. J. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. Corcoran Substance Abuse Treatment Facility II et al
as 1:2018cv01697
Defendant:
Sergeant Roacha, Stu Sherman, M. Solario and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Jones v. Madden
as 1:2018cv01576
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
William J Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology, Stephen Phillips, Nicole J. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College , Farnaz Samavi and Richard Leutenbacher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ryokan College v. California Board of Psychology et al
as 2:2018at00047
Defendant:
California Board of Psychology, Stephen Phillips, Nicole J. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ryokan College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Washington v. Rashid et al
as 2:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
Tyree Washington
Defendant:
T. Rashid, D. Gonzales, V. Willick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.