Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nelson v. Streeter
as 1:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
William Nelson, III
Defendant:
Jessie J. Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Streeter
as 3:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Gregory Deon Jones
Defendant:
Jessie J. Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Streeter et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Petitioner:
Columbus Carr, Jr.
Respondent:
Jessie J. Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Streeter
as 3:2011cv00710
Petitioner:
Virgil N. Johnson
Defendant:
Jessie J. Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spragin v. Streeter et al
as 3:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kurt Spragin
Defendant:
J. J. Streeter, Michael Millwood, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
German v. Streeter et al
as 3:2011cv00100
Petitioner:
Cherelle German
Respondent:
Jessie J. Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Streeter et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Petitioner:
Bryant Vaughn
Respondent:
Jessie J. Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Streeter et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Petitioner:
James L. Collins
Defendant:
J. J. Streeter and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenoir v. Streeter et al
as 1:2009cv00173
Petitioner:
Ray Charles Lenoir
Respondent:
J. J. Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. MCCF et al
as 3:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Tommy White, Sr.
Defendant:
MCCF, Ray Heather, Phyllis Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
