Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Nooth et al
as 2:2016cv01377
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Bradley
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, Sgt. K. Smith and Lt. J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah v. Nooth et al
as 2:2016cv00534
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe, Officer Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guille v. Cleaver et al
as 2:2015cv00364
Defendant:
Sgt. Cleaver, Sgt. Nguyen, Cptn. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Guille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2015cv00294
Petitioner:
Karl Morgan Hall
Respondent:
State of Oregon and J. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Shelton et al
as 2:2014cv02071
Defendant:
Garth Gulick, Steve Shelton and J. Taylor
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villines v. Taylor
as 2:2014cv00700
Respondent:
Ms. J. Taylor
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Paul Ray Villines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jump v. Taylor
as 2:2014cv00159
Petitioner:
Michael Jump
Respondent:
J. Taylor
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, B. Anana, Archer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Benson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cufaude v. Nooth et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Defendant:
J. Bell, L. Braun, Coombs and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cufaude
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
