Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allen v. Eckard et al
as 1:2017cv00996
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen
Defendant:
J.A. Eckard, A. Eberling, K.M. Sparr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. ECKARD et al
as 2:2016cv00052
Petitioner:
KEITH WARREN
Respondent:
J.A. ECKARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. Captain Harris et al
as 3:2015cv02514
Plaintiff:
Tracy R. Bradley
Defendant:
Captain Harris, J.A. Eckard, Lieutenant House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREEDEN v. ECKARD et al
as 2:2014cv06832
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. BREEDEN
Respondent:
J.A. ECKARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FIGUEROA v. ECKARD et al
as 5:2014cv06598
Petitioner:
HIRAM LEBRON FIGUEROA
Respondent:
J.A. ECKARD and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARPENTER v. ECKARD et al
as 2:2014cv04751
Petitioner:
WESLEY CARPENTER
Respondent:
J.A ECKARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Morrison et al
as 3:2011cv01791
Plaintiff:
Rysheen A Jackson
Defendant:
E. Morrison, Kauffman, C Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2011cv01308
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
Mr. Lawler, Connie Green, Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Pennsylvania Department of Correction Personnel at S.C.I. Huntingdon et al
as 1:2011cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brian Cook
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Correction Personnel at S.C.I. Huntingdon, Shirley R. Moore, Brian Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
