Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 5:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
FNU Morgan, J.C. Walker, FNU Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
Morgan, J.C. Walker, Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Jason Carthy McGhee, Jr. and J.C. Makkuv El
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, A. Harding, T.K. Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee et al v. Jacksonville Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Jason Carthy McGhee, Jr., J.C. Makkuv El, Jason Carthy McGhee Jr. Trust and others
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriffs Office, City of Jacksonville, Adrian G. Soud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Bryant et al
as 9:2022cv80089
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Joseph
Defendant:
J.C. Bryant, Delhommas, V. Ramdat and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Ballou, Art, CJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Capshaw v. Thomas et al
as 8:2021cv02414
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Capshaw
Defendant:
J.C. Thomas and A. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haile et al v. Langford et al
as 6:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
John Jay Haile, Sr., C. J. Haile, John Haile, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Langford, Sgt. Sanford, Sgt. Q. Dorm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2014cv01344
Plaintiff:
James Williams Thomas
Defendant:
State Of Florida, District Attorney's Office, Polk County, Public Defender's Office, Polk County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeMaster v. Loar et al
as 2:2011cv14086
Plaintiff:
Kenley J.C. LeMaster
Defendant:
Deryl Loar and Selby Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
