Cases 1 - 10 of 12
v. Scherer et al
as 6:2023cv02382
Defendant:
Ronald E. Scherer, Sr., United States of America, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Scherer v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv02383
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Scherer, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv20335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv24450
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23858
Defendant:
BDS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, PAYSAFECARD.COM USA, INC, MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Gerecs, ANTONIO GOMEZ and Ricardo Alejandro Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00930
Plaintiff:
Sharon Wright
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Edward Hellwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv62099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oakley v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 9:2013cv80255
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Oakley
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. v. Erneta
as 1:2012cv23515
Plaintiff:
Haydee Erneta
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Madow v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
as 6:2010cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Madow
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
