Cases 1 - 5 of 5
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Floyd et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Anya Gwelyn Floyd, J.S., A MINOR CHILD IN THE CARE OF HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, GEMMA JUNELLA ASHLY and ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN HEIRS, BENEFICIARIES, DEVISEES, CREDITORS, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, TRUSTEES AND ALL OTHER PARTIES CLAIMING AN INTEREST BY, THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST THE ESTATE OF MABLE HARRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chester Abing, et al v. James Evers, et al
as 22-15097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHESTER NOEL ABING, DENNIS DUANE DESHAW and SUSAN KAY BROER-DESHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES F. EVERS, JOHN N. TOKUNAGA, STEPHEN H. LEVINS and others
SEABROOKS et al v. TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC., PA et al
as 2:2018cv17760
Defendant:
TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC., PA, TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC.,, ZHONGSHAN JINGUANG HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE MANUFACTURE CO., LTD., and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SEABROOKS, PEARL SEABROOKS and PEARL SEABROOKS AS PARENT AND NEXT FRIEND OF J.S., A MINOR,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kathleen F. Hudson, as trustee of the Doris J. Sims Revocable Living Trust dated July 26, 2006, and any amendments thereto v. J.S. Gleason, Jr., Administrator of Veterans Affairs, an officer of the United States of America, and his successors in office
as 2:2015cv14490
Plaintiff:
Kathleen F. Hudson, as trustee of the Doris J. Sims Revocable Living Trust dated July 26, 2006, and any amendments thereto
Defendant:
J.S. Gleason, Jr., Administrator of Veterans Affairs, an officer of the United States of America, and his successors in office
Miller et al v. McCloud et al
as 1:2014cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Miller , Terance M. Maher , Max H. Owen and others
Defendant:
Harold S. McCloud , Debra A. McCloud and Thomas J. Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
