Cases 31 - 40 of 76
PURUSHOTHAMAN et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00481
Plaintiff:
DEEPAK PURUSHOTHAMAN and LAVANYA ARUMUGAM
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LORETTA E. LYNCH , JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
CHOPRA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
RAJESH CHOPRA and MANPREET BAWA
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LORETTA E. LYNCH , JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
HU et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
CHUANG HU , RONG QIAN and ZAIYI QIAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ, KATHY A. BARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Ljubica Rajkovic v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ljubica Rajkovic
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, James B. Comey, Daniel Walker and others
XIAO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
CHANG XIAO
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LEON RODRIGUEZ , KATHY A. BARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Syed Zaidi v. United States Sentencing Comm, et al
as 15-5350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Syed Haider Karrar Zaidi
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Sentencing Commission, Barack Obama, President of the United States, Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
